Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -

Municipal Engineer

ISSN 0965-0903 | E-ISSN 1751-7699
Volume 171 Issue 4, December, 2018, pp. 185-195

 

Open access content Subscribed content Free content Trial content

Full Text

The municipal solid waste (MSW) generation in Hong Kong (HK) is increasing at a rapid pace, resulting in health and environmental issues for the public. Compared with Singapore and Shanghai, HK has a higher MSW generation rate due to less effective measures and government policies. To forecast the MSW generation and recycling in HK, system dynamics modelling was conducted using Vensim 6.0, based on the data collected from semi-structured interviews and official reports in the Environmental Protection Department of HK, the National Environmental Agency Singapore and Shanghai Environmental Protection Agency that regularly provide statistics on waste outputs. The simulation results show that shortly the MSW in HK will increase based on the current growth rates, and along with that, recycling will also increase. The recycling rates will offset that of the MSW generation due to the closure of landfills, and MSW will be effectively recycled due to more advanced disposal techniques. The strategies developed by the HK government will be able to manage the MSW disposal, but the city will experience more severe MSW conditions in the future as its landfills are expected to close earlier than planned. Recommendations for HK to deal with MSW generation were derived from the experiences in Singapore and Shanghai.

Municipal solid wastes (MSWs) are those substances discarded within the municipal area (Wei et al., 2017). The main sources of MSW vary but include commercial, residential, industrial or institutional; each of these can be further segregated into different categories based on the physical composition of wastes (Baawain et al., 2017; Lavee and Khatib, 2010). MSW is a significant issue for Hong Kong (HK) as the MSW amount is increasing at a rapid rate (Ling, 2015). The composition and amount of MSW are determined by factors such as population, income, household size, emigration rate and economic conditions (Cai et al., 2014). The land area in HK is less than 259 square kilometres, but is home to about 7·18 million people. Currently, HK has only three operating landfills and 13 closed landfills (Hong et al., 2010). In 1998, the HK government published a framework on waste reduction to set-out initiatives for the reduction of waste in the city (Chung et al., 2010). After some trials testing the effectiveness of different waste management strategies, a territory-wide programme was developed in 2005 to facilitate the separation of waste in buildings (Chung et al., 2010). The waste disposal ordinance in 1980 provided the statutory framework to manage all types of wastes in HK, which offers licenses for waste collection and disposal facilities (Chan, 2001). The government of HK also developed and enacted the product eco-responsibility legislation in 2008 to manage MSW in the city (Chen et al., 2013). MSW refers to the waste generated by humans in their daily lives (Lee et al., 2016) excluding construction and demolition waste, chemical waste and some special industrial wastes (Prades et al., 2014). The increasing population results in an increase in waste so that the projection of waste generation becomes a critical issue for many cities (Wang et al., 2011). With fast economic development, humans tend to generate more waste, especially when people can spend more and consumption increases (Hong et al., 2017). MSW is piled up and is gradually becoming a major problem due to the complexity in collection and treatment (Lavee and Khatib, 2010). The rapid increase in MSW has stirred up problems such as public health and environmental changes (Antmann et al., 2013).

One of the most common methods used to deal with MSW is landfilling, which has been adopted by many cities around the world leading to the lack of sufficient lands and a strong emergence of landfill gases (Bernstad, 2014). The landfill emissions lead to odour pollution and respiratory diseases (Chowdhury, 2009). HK set the target to raise the MSW recovery from 34% in 2002 to 36% in 2004, 40% in 2007 and then 50% in 2015. As a comparison, Florida in the USA has decided to increase the MSW recovery rate to 75% by 2020 (Liyanage et al., 2015). The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) of HK keeps regular statistics on each type of waste. The analysis of these statistics is important as it allows evaluation of whether the system is working properly. System dynamics (SD) is a robust tool that can use these statistics and provide a comprehensive simulation of the waste management process (Kollikkathara et al., 2009). According to Machowski et al. (2008), SD focuses on the feedforward and feedback relationships, and it develops relationships between rate variables and stock variables. SD analyses problems and allows analysis of complex, non-linear relationships aided by computer simulations to conceptualise and to rationally analyse structures and interactions and to prognosticate their effects in a holistic way (Inghels and Dullaert, 2010). The HK's daily domestic waste generation rate per capita is much higher than that of other Asian cities such as Shanghai and Singapore. HK is running out of landfilling spaces earlier than planned and the current landfills will be exhausted by 2020 (Liyanage et al., 2015). There is an urgent need to forecast the rapid increasing MSW in HK and to provide accurate modelling for control purposes. In the past, researchers focused on gross domestic product (GDP) as the only indicator of waste generation; however, according to Lam and Chan (2014), other factors such as infant mortality, labour force size, population density and life expectancy should be included. By analysing the historical and current MSW statistics in HK and other Asian cities such as Singapore and Shanghai through interviews and documentation research, this study develops a SD simulation to forecast the future MSW generation in HK for control purposes. A comparison and contrast of MSW analysis between HK, Singapore and Shanghai are provided.

The MSW loads in HK were increasing since the year 1986. HK's MSW comprises of over 70% solid waste, and the daily waste disposal has reached 311 t (Han et al., 2014). Waste recycling is more complex than its reduction. In 1998, the HK government launched the Waste Reduction Framework Plan, which provided a variety of initiatives to reduce waste and recommended a series of measures to promote MSW separation and segregation in HK (Jaillon et al., 2009). The plan was to improve the overall MSW recovery rate from 34% in 2004 to 40% in 2007 and to increase the household waste recovery rate from 8% in 2004 to 20% in 2007. The HK government published the first sustainable development strategy in 2005, including a policy framework for MSW management in HK (Zhang et al., 2012), which proposes a simple and effective tool to create incentives for the community to recycle more and to discard less (Han et al., 2014). For example, the government levies a scheme to direct the economic incentives to reduce the use of plastic shopping bags in the city (Lu and Yuan, 2013).

According to Yu et al. (2013), the EPD in HK manages collecting, treating, disposing and transferring MSW in the city; more than HK$10 billion (HK$1 = £0·10) has been invested in MSW facilities to manage the waste. The waste disposal ordinance was used to control the waste disposal including export and import (Yu et al., 2013). The three operating landfills are located in the new territories, namely: Nim Wang, Tseung Kwan O and Ta Kwu Ling. Thirteen out of 16 landfills in HK have been closed and restored for several uses to minimise potential health risks. For example, some were landscaped to offer green zones and recreational uses such as golf driving ranges, grass pitches and ecological parks.

There are seven refuse transfer stations located in different areas but with centralised collection points. The waste from smaller refuse collection trucks is compacted and transferred into containers and shipped to landfills through lorries. The chemical waste treatment centre on Tsing Yi Island accepts different chemical and clinical waste. The Sha Ling Composting Plant in the northern new territories accepts livestock waste and composts it into soil suitable for the use in the city. With the efforts of the government and community, the waste recovery rate in HK has been increasing, and over 80% of the HK population has been involved in the waste separation programme (Yau, 2010). Materials in MSW such as paints, plastics, disposed goods and inks are considered hazardous (Wei et al., 2017), and the waste management occupies the uppermost rung in the hierarchy of waste management (Zhou et al., 2015). The hierarchy refers to those activities undertaken with an item before it is perceived as waste, which includes the decrease of total waste produced, the decrease in the associated environmental impacts on the public and the decreased quantity of noxious objects (Gidarakos, 2015). Some effective methods for waste reduction include adjustments in the usage of raw materials and the adoption of a suitable production process (Gidarakos, 2015).

Asian cities such as HK, Singapore, Shanghai, Taiwan and Beijing are among the leading cities regarding both economic development and waste generation. The city GDP per capita in some Asian megacities such as Bangkok, Shanghai, Jakarta, Manila, Beijing and Kuala Lumpur is two- to five-times higher than other cities. The estimates of expected typical values for MSW in some Asian cities are listed in Table 1. High- and middle-income cities (such as HK, Singapore, Tokyo, Taipei, Seoul, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Beijing and Shanghai) have a daily material consumption from 4000 to 14 000 t and this creates a daily MSW at around 250–750 t. On the other hand, low-income cities such as Manila and Jakarta have a much lower daily material consumption and a MSW generation. The middle- and low-income rural regions have a daily material consumption ranged from 500 to 2000 t, and MSW generation from 120 to 200 t (Ali and Sion, 2014). Table 2 shows that HK has higher agriculture, forest, marine and urban density than other cities such as Guangzhou, Bangkok and Beijing.

Table

Table 1. Estimated material consumption and waste generating in Asian cities (Ali and Sion, 2014)

Table 1. Estimated material consumption and waste generating in Asian cities (Ali and Sion, 2014)

Asian cities Daily material consumption: t Daily municipal solid waste: t
High-income cities: HK, Singapore, Tokyo, Taipei, Seoul 6000–14 000 500–750
Middle-income cities: Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Beijing, Shanghai 4000–6000 250–550
Low-income cities: Manila, Jakarta 3000–5000 50–250
Rural areas in middle-and-low income regions 500–2000 120–200
Table

Table 2. HK compared with some Asian cities (Ali and Sion, 2014)

Table 2. HK compared with some Asian cities (Ali and Sion, 2014)

City Agriculture area: km2 Forest area: km2 Marine area: km2 Total area: km2 Urban density: people per km2 MSW per km2 city area: t/km2
HK 1800 2100 20 000 23 900 57 000 1400
Guangzhou 1000 700 5000 6700 2400 16
Bangkok 800 300 10 000 11 100 10 000 110
Beijing 600 150 5000 5750 20 000 110
Rural area 500 50 2000 2550 n.a. n.a.
Basic cities 5000 1800 13 300 20 100 10 000 200

SD is a robust process used to analyse complex systems aided by computer simulation. SD can accommodate internal feedback loops and time delays, such as required when forecasting on MSW generation and control. The process of a SD model starts with identifying the parameters; in this study, the parameters refer to those factors for waste generation (Liu and Li, 2015). In the past, researchers only focused on GDP as an indicator for waste generation, but Lam and Chan (2014) have suggested that additional factors should be included, particularly (a) population, (b) household size, (c) standard of living and (d) purchasing power. Hong et al. (2010) conceptually describe the relationship between these parameters and MSW generation as higher economic growth leads to higher public spending, which increases the waste generation; higher income leads to higher waste generation; and, more population generates more MSW. HK is a highly populated city with 6650 persons per square kilometre. The median monthly domestic household income is around HK$22 400, and it is increasing; the total labour force is around 3·86 million people (Cai et al., 2014). In this study, data for SD modelling were collected from semi-structured interviews and official reports in the EPD of HK, Shanghai Environmental Protection Agency and the National Environmental Agency Singapore, which regularly provide statistics on daily/monthly/annual waste outputs in their cities. The Vensim 6.0 software package was used to simulate the dynamic process of the system.

The first step in generating the dynamic simulation was developing the stock-and-flow diagram by defining the variables influencing on MSW generation using the box variable function and rate variable function in Vensim 6.0 as shown in Figure 1. MSW generation is the box variable, and MSW increase rate and MSW decrease rate are the rate variables. The second step was to identify the variables influencing the values. Step 3 is based on the causal loop diagram among variables such as household waste increasing rate, MSW generation per household and household spending per capita rate. The MSW decrease rate was determined in step 4. Step 5 develops causal loop diagram towards the MSW disposal volume, resulting in the decrease in the landfill rate. MSW disposal volume is the starting point followed by MSW recovery rate, total waste disposed and MSW disposal. Step 6 defines the stock-and-flow diagram for landfill in HK, where landfill is a box variable. The simulation as developed at this step could determine the amount of waste disposed at landfills to forecast future waste. Step 7 integrates causal loop diagrams and stock-and-flow diagrams to finalise the SD model.

figure parent remove

Figure 1. A seven-step SD modelling for MSW forecasting

5.1 Limitations of previous research

Chung (2010) conducted research to forecast MSW in HK until 2036, based on GDP and a linear relationship between GDP growth and MSW increment; a correlation between MSW generation and the population was found to be useful. However, Chung (2010) also identified a key limitation: using GDP for predictions is inaccurate, and it may overestimate the actual quantities of MSW generation. As evidence of this limitation, Table 3 (by Chung, 2010) shows the comparison between the projected quantities based on GDP and the actual quantities of domestic waste disposal.

Table

Table 3. Waste predictions by Chung (2010)

Table 3. Waste predictions by Chung (2010)

Forecasts Projected quantities Actual quantities
Forecasts from 1998 study
 MSW in 1996: t/d 14 500 8140(+)
 MSW in 2001: t/d 18 600 9300(+)
 MSW in 2006: t/d 23 400 9279(+)
Forecasts from 1989 to 1900 study
 Per capita domestic waste disposal rate in 2001: kg/d 1·3 1·12(+)
 Per capita domestic waste disposal in 2001: kg/d 1·33 1·12(+)
Forecasts from 1993 to 1994 study
 Per capita domestic waste disposal in 2006: kg/d 1·5 0·97(+)
Forecasts from 1995 study
 Domestic waste in 2001 7830 7551(+)
 Domestic waste in 2006 9690 6634(+)
Forecasts from 1996 study
 Per capita domestic waste disposal in 2001: kg/d 1·25 0·97(+)
Forecasts from the 1998 study 9150 6635(+)
 Domestic waste in 2001 7460 7551(−)
 Domestic waste in 2006 8430 6634(+)
Forecasts from 1998 study
 Domestic waste in 2006 10 090 6634(+)
5.2 Territorial waste disposal rates and quantity of MSW disposed and recovered

The GDP per capita (Table 4) and MSW disposal rate and domestic waste disposal rate (Table 5) were collected from the EPD of HK, which regularly monitors MSW in the city. The MSW disposal rate is increasing on a yearly basis. For example, the MSW disposal rate was 1·28 kg/d in 1991 but increased to 1·33 kg/d in 2013. On the other hand, the domestic waste disposal rate has declined, for instance, it was 0·97 kg/d in 1991 but only 0·88 kg/d in 2013.

Table

Table 4. GDP per capita

Table 4. GDP per capita

Year Housing estates GDP per capita: HK$ Year Housing estate GDP per capita: HK$
2007 700 233 358 2022 2015 324 072
2008 865 234 722 2023 2015 330 095
2009 1140 243 227 2024 2015 336 298
2010 1360 252 027 2025 2015 342 698
2011 1574 261 177 2026 2015 349 308
2012 1795 270 679 2027 2015 356 144
2013 2015 275 640 2028 2015 363 216
2014 2015 280 734 2029 2015 370 534
2015 2015 285 957 2030 2015 378 117
2016 2015 291 311 2031 2015 385 975
2017 2015 296 413 2032 2015 394 122
2018 2015 301 652 2033 2015 402 563
2019 2015 307 029 2034 2015 411 313
2020 2015 312 549 2035 2015 420 381
2021 2015 318 229 2036 2015 429 774
Table

Table 5. MSW disposal rate and domestic waste disposal rate

Table 5. MSW disposal rate and domestic waste disposal rate

Year MSW disposal rate: kg/d Domestic waste disposal rate: kg/d
1991 1·28 0·97
1992 1·37 0·99
1993 1·43 1·02
1994 1·40 1·01
1995 1·27 1·01
1996 1·26 0·97
1997 1·34 1·04
1998 1·33 1·04
1999 1·40 1·12
2000 1·40 1·13
2001 1·39 1·12
2002 1·40 1·11
2003 1·40 1·10
2004 1·37 1·03
2005 1·38 1·00
2006 1·35 0·97
2007 1·33 0·92
2008 1·30 0·87
2009 1·29 0·86
2010 1·30 0·87
2011 1·27 0·84
2012 1·30 0·88
2013 1·33 0·88

Table 6 lists the MSW disposed and recovered during the year 1991–2013 collected from the EPD of HK, which shows that the amount of MSW disposed and recovered has constantly been increasing from the year 1991 to 2013.

Table

Table 6. MSW disposed and MSW recovered

Table 6. MSW disposed and MSW recovered

Year MSW disposed: 1000 t MSW recovered: 1000 t
1991 2700 1560
1992 2890 1780
1993 3090 1740
1994 3080 1860
1995 2850 1930
1996 2970 1640
1997 3170 1540
1998 3190 1560
1999 3380 1540
2000 3420 1760
2001 3390 1940
2002 3440 1990
2003 3450 1960
2004 3400 2380
2005 3420 2300
2006 3390 2590
2007 3350 2840
2008 3300 2810
2009 3270 3140
2010 3330 3600
2011 3280 3020
2012 3396 2163
2013 3485 2009

Table 7 lists the quantities of waste disposed at landfills from the year 2005 to 2013 collected from the EPD of HK. These quantities have increased since 2007. The amount of waste disposed of declined in 2006 but increased at a rapid rate from 2007 onward and reached 5·223 Mt in 2013.

Table

Table 7. Quantities of waste disposal at landfills in 2005–2013

Table 7. Quantities of waste disposal at landfills in 2005–2013

Quantity: 1000 t 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Domestic 2490 2420 2330 2230 2200 2240 2180 2301 2321
Commercial 690 750 800 830 850 860 861 827 879
Industrial 240 210 230 240 230 230 242 268 285
Construction 2390 1510 1150 1130 1140 1310 1216 1259 1311
Special 640 600 570 510 450 410 413 412 428
Total 6450 5490 5080 4940 4870 5050 4912 5067 5223

These data assisted with the determination of coefficients used in the SD modelling in Vensim 6.0 to project the future waste generation in HK. Disposal volumes were computed by MSW generation/recovery rate. The system-based prediction and response model in Figure 2 considers variables such as MSW volume rate, landfill rate for landfill capacity, MSW disposal volume, population and household spending.

figure parent remove

Figure 2. System-based MSW prediction and response model

Figure 3 is the tree diagram for the SD modelling, where Figure 3(a) shows the main variables used to compute the MSW generation rate in HK; Figure 3(b) shows all consequences of landfills; and Figure 3(c) shows all consequences of MSW generation.

figure parent remove

Figure 3. Tree diagrams for MSW in HK: (a) main variables used to compute the MSW generation rate in HK, (b) all consequences of landfills and (c) all consequences of MSW generation

5.3 Simulation results and finding

Table 8 shows the sensitivity analysis on landfill recovery rates forecasting until 2025. The ‘MSW landfill volume reduced’ column shows the reduction in the landfill volume, which shows a positive sign that there is a decline in the landfill through the use of prevention methods by the government.

Table

Table 8. Simulation on landfill recovery rate

Table 8. Simulation on landfill recovery rate

Year Total waste generated per day: t Annual landfill rate: 1000 t Landfill prevention with measures: 1000 t Total waste landfill volume reduced: 1000 t
2013 14 311 5 151 960 3 245 735 1 906 225
2014 14 798 5 327 280 3 356 186 1 971 094
2015 15 301 5 508 360 3 470 267 2 038 093
2016 15 821 5 695 560 3 588 203 2 107 357
2017 16 359 5 889 240 3 710 221 2 179 019
2018 16 915 6 089 400 3 836 322 2 253 078
2019 17 490 6 296 400 3 966 732 2 329 668
2020 18 085 6 510 600 4 101 678 2 408 922
2021 18 700 6 732 000 4 241 160 2 490 840
2022 19 335 6 960 600 4 385 178 2 575 422
2023 19 993 7 197 480 4 534 412 2 663 068
2024 20 673 7 442 280 4 688 636 2 753 644
2025 20 802 7 488 720 4 792 781 2 770 826

The simulation compares the forecasting of MSW generation and the total waste generation in HK until 2025, in which MSW is constantly increasing but there is a slow decline in the growth of the MSW generation. Table 9 forecasts MSW generation and recycling until 2025 based on the simulation. The main reason for the higher increase from the year 2013 to 2022 is that the three remaining landfills will close between 2017 and 2019. After 2019, there will be no landfill available to dispose of MSW, which will lead to waste overflow in 2020. However, the HK government has identified this issue and is developing new landfills as a solution. The total waste generation in 2013 was 5·152 Mt, and the MSW generation was 9547 t/d so that the annual MSW generation is 9547 t × 12 × 30 = 3·437 Mt/year. MSW in 2013 was 3·437 Mt/year but increasing at a rapid pace due to the fast growth of population. Table 10 lists the historical data of MSW disposed at landfills from 2007 to 2013; this shows a fluctuation in the domestic solid waste from 2008, but it started to increase from 2011 to 2·321 Mt in 2013. The commercial solid waste disposal at landfills has also increased from 2007 to 2013. There is a general increase in the quantities of all types of solid waste disposed at the landfills from the year 2007 to 2013. The left graph in Figure 4 simulates the MSW recycled from the year 2013 to 2025 and showed that the recycling rate will increase in the near future. The middle graph in Figure 4 simulates the landfilled waste in HK. The right graph in Figure 4 shows the amount of waste prevented from going to landfill, which shows a similar, positive trend.

figure parent remove

Figure 4. MSW recycled (top), landfilled waste (middle) and prevented from landfill (bottom)

Table

Table 9. Simulation on waste generation and recycled

Table 9. Simulation on waste generation and recycled

Time: year Total waste generation: Mt MSW generation: Mt MSW recycled: Mt
2013 5·152 3·437 1·272
2014 5·327 3·554 1·315
2015 5·508 3·675 1·360
2016 5·696 3·800 1·406
2017 5·889 3·929 1·454
2018 6·089 4·062 1·503
2019 6·296 4·200 1·554
2020 6·511 4·343 1·737
2021 6·732 4·461 1·784
2022 6·914 4·581 1·832
2023 7·100 4·705 1·882
2024 7·292 4·832 1·933
2025 7·489 4·962 1·985
Table

Table 10. Quantities of solid waste disposed of at landfills in 2007–2013

Table 10. Quantities of solid waste disposed of at landfills in 2007–2013

Quantity: Mt 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Domestic 2330 2230 2200 2240 2180 2301 2321
Commercial 800 830 850 860 861 827 879
Industrial 230 240 230 230 242 268 285
Construction 1150 1130 1140 1310 1216 1259 1311
Special 570 510 450 410 413 412 428
Total 5080 4940 4870 5050 4912 5067 5223

Figure 5 simulates the comparison among total waste generation, MSW generation and waste recycled until the year 2025. The amount of landfilled waste is below the level of MSW generation. The amount of landfilled waste is increasing over the coming decades. The high recycling rates may be due to the closure of landfills that are currently operating, forcing more waste to be effectively recycled with more advanced disposal techniques.

figure parent remove

Figure 5. Comparison among waste generated, recycled, landfilled and landfilled recycled

5.4 Comparative discussions between HK, Singapore and Shanghai

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with officers in the EPD of HK, Shanghai Environmental Protection Agency and the National Environmental Agency Singapore and related documentation was carefully studied. The fast economic and population growth in HK and Singapore have led to significant increases in MSW generation in both cities, leading to an increased environmental burden in relation to water, air and soil pollution, natural habitat degradation and various diseases. HK and Singapore are the most developed cities, major commercial hubs and financial centres in the Southeast Asia. Both are small but highly populated; Singapore is smaller than HK but has a greater population. Singapore has an annual MSW generation around 7 Mt equivalent to 1·3 (t/capita)/year. The waste management policy in Singapore was developed by the National Environmental Agency Singapore, guided by three major policy platforms relating to waste minimisation, recycling at landfills and waste reduction through incineration. The total amount and proportion of MSW generation in HK and Singapore is very similar, but Singapore has a better MSW recovery and recycling rate than HK. The collection and disposal of industrial and commercial wastes in Singapore are paid for by commercial organisations instead of individuals, and this stimulates waste recycling. Currently, about 2000 t of waste in Singapore is transported daily from the Tuas Marine station to the landfill. The landfill covers 350 ha, and it has been effectively managed to run for a long period. Singapore has a better landfill management and MSW processes than HK does.

Shanghai is the largest and most highly populated port city in the mainland China with an around 25 million population (An et al., 2014). Similar to HK and Singapore, Shanghai is also a global financial centre and a transport hub that has experienced rapid growth, urbanisation and industrialisation, all of which has generated significant increases in MSW (Gao, 2008). Shanghai has around 7·02 Mt waste per year of which 52% was disposed in landfills, 10% was composted, 16% was incinerated and 19% discarded at unsanitary landfills (Chung et al., 2010). The investment in waste processing and the construction of sewage treatment plants and sewer networks has been steadily improving in Shanghai (Chung et al., 2010). Shanghai has about 30 small-to-medium-sized sewage treatment plants and three large sewage treatment plants (‘Laogang’, ‘HK Bailong’ and ‘Chuk Yuen’) handling up to 170 t of waste daily (Zhang et al., 2012). Also, to improve the wastewater collection and treatment, 659 km of the pipeline has been newly laid. However, despite the good infrastructure, it seems some treatment plants are not connected to the sewerage system. While this kind of issue has certainly drawn great attention, it is subordinate to economic needs (Zhang et al., 2012). Shanghai has less MSW generation than HK over the last decades due to the more effective planning measures and government policies that have been enacted.

Among these three cities, HK has the highest MSW generation rates due to the less effective planning measures and government policies. Based on the interviews, some recommendations for HK were derived according to the experiences of Singapore and Shanghai in dealing with MSW generation. Singapore has implemented a national recycling programme, which is a voluntary programme for households as well as for trade premises. Under the national recycling programme, bags and bins are provided for waste storage, and these bags and bins are collected fortnightly; around 63% Singapore households participated in this programme. Apart from the MSW collection, Singapore has also implemented the waste minimisation hierarchy ‘Towards Zero Landfill’. The main goal of the programme was to move the city towards zero landfill use by reducing waste generation. Payments received from commercial organisations, rather than individuals in Singapore, has played an important role in waste processing. Singapore also has the effective ‘Recycling Corner Programme’ that started in 2002 for schools to provide education and consultation to students about reducing, reusing and recycling waste; around 84% Singapore schools joined this programme, and it plays an important role in shaping the behaviours of future generations (Williams, 2014). HK could also implement the strategies learnt from Shanghai; for example, one useful strategy developed by the Environment Protection Agency Shanghai was to allocate special funds for waste management. Shanghai every year allots around US$5 billion (3·05% of the city GDP) for this purpose (Yang et al., 2014). The government of Shanghai charges US$0·44 per month to each household for waste manage services.

Historical data regarding MSW generation in HK (including MSW volume rate, landfill rate for landfill capacity, MSW disposal volume, population and household spending) were used to determine coefficients in the SD modelling to project the future waste generation in HK. A system-based MSW prediction and response model was developed in this study using a seven-step SD model. The SD simulation forecasts the MSW generation and recycling in HK, which shows that in the near future the MSW will increase based on the current growth rates, and along with that the waste recycling will also improve. The strategies developed by the HK government regarding MSW disposal provide scope for further improvement because HK will experience more severe MSW conditions in the future as its landfills are expected to be closed earlier than planned. Compared with Singapore and Shanghai, HK has a higher MSW generation rate due to less effective planning measures and government policies. Recommendations for HK to support the management of MSW generation were derived according to the experiences of Singapore and Shanghai. HK could learn from Singapore and start programmes to provide education and consultation to school students on reducing, reusing and recycling of waste to shape and influence the behaviours of future generations. HK could also implement the strategies learnt from Shanghai to allocate special funds for waste management. Future studies are recommended to simulate the MSW generation and recycling in all these cities so that accurate comparison can be made that will allow the development of an effective solution for HK as well as the other two cities.

References

Cited By

Related content

Related search

By Keyword
By Author

No search history

Recently Viewed