Decision-support tools for sustainable urban development
More details?
Sustainability has become one of the expected competencies for the civil engineer. Embedding sustainability into practice constitutes a burden of responsibility, yet an opportunity to provide leadership. It is one of those subjects that we cannot afford to ignore.
ICE Proceedings: Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the 'how to' of engineering a resilient future.
It features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included.
The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.
- Editorial Advisory Panel
- Submit a paper online
- Publish with Us
More like this?
- In this publication
- In this subject:
Construction Materials,
Waste Management,
Structures and Buildings,
Municipal, Community, Urban & Rural,
Water and Wastewater,
Sitework,
Energy,
Environment,
Civil Engineering Industry
- By this author:
Z. Kapelan
,
D. A. Savic
,
G. A. Walters
The focus of this paper is on the complex, integrated decision-support tools (DSTs) for sustainable urban development. The main goal is to identify the principal strengths and weaknesses of these tools while considering the broader issue of how an integrated urban decisionsupport system can be developed (or existing tools improved) that will integrate a wide range of criteria including socio-economic and environmental aspects, plus stakeholder participation, into the decision-making process. To achieve this goal, a relatively large number of various DSTs were first identified. These tools were then analysed using a set of criteria developed specifically for that purpose. For each criterion, a description of a perceived ideal DST is provided and then used when analysing existing DSTs. Finally, it is concluded that modern integrated DSTs for sustainable urban development, despite increased complexity and flexibility, still need to be improved to provide better support in the associated decision-making processes. The recommended areas for future improvements include higher levels of DST integration, introduction of the systematic risk and uncertainty modelling, wider use of the ranking and optimisation methodologies, further development of the detailed impact assessment models, wider and better use of advanced visualisation techniques, improved support for group decision making and communication and more systematic calibration and validation of the models.
Share this article with others:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.