Home
>> Journals
>> Proceedings of the ICE - Construction Materials
>>
Volume 165, Issue 4
>> Article
UK contractors’ views on self-compacting concrete in construction
This article is available for purchase
- Buy Article $40.00
- Authors: David Rich 1 ; Jacqui Glass 2 ; Alistair G. F. Gibb 3 ; Chris Goodier 4
- + View affiliations- Hide affiliations
- Source: Proceedings of the ICE - Construction Materials, Volume 165, Issue 4, February 2012 pages 201 –210
Affiliations:
1:
Research Engineer, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK
;
2:
Senior Lecturer in Architecture and Sustainable Construction, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK
;
3:
Professor of Construction Engineering Management, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK
;
4:
Lecturer in Structures and Materials, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK
Preview this article:
UK contractors’ views on self-compacting concrete in construction, Page 1 of 2
< Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/coma165-201-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/coma165-201-2.gif
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is claimed to offer faster construction, safer sites and more consistent concrete quality,
but little corroborative research data exist on performance advantages, particularly in comparison with traditional
construction. Industry opinions also appear to be divided. For these reasons, an extensive interview programme was
undertaken with UK contractors – from large national concrete frame contractors to small, locally based housebuilders
– to assess whether benefits were being achieved and to try to understand the reasons why SCC is, or is not, being
used. The 48 participants reported that decisions on the suitability of SCC were inherently complex and, if selected,
there were challenges in understanding ‘how’ construction should be planned and managed to accommodate the use
of SCC and to fully utilise its advantages. The findings identify the need for a step change in the industry’s perception
of SCC, such that it should be considered as a construction method, not simply as a material.
ISSN :
1747-650X
E-ISSN :
1747-6518
Document Type:
Research Article
Format:
HTML,PDF
/content/article/10.1680/coma.10.00036
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3

